One more update on d-programming-language.org

[piotrek]

On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:57:44 +0000, retard wrote:

> Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:53:41 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:39:19 -0400, retard <re at tard.com.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:02:56 +0200, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:36, Nick Sabalausky <a at a.a> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "retard" <re at tard.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>> news:i6ubrl$2djc$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>>>> > Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:32:16 +0200, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:07, Lars T. Kyllingstad
>>>>> >> <public at kyllingen.nospamnet> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>> > As for this particular bug: thanks Walter!
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > Philippe
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Actually, Johannes deserves your thanks for this one -- he wrote
>>>>> >>> the patch. :)
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >> I heartily thank Johannes.
>>>>> >> <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:07, Lars T.
>>>>> >> Kyllingstad <span
>>>>> >> dir="ltr">&lt;public at kyllingen.nospamnet&gt;</span>
>>>>> >> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
>>>>> >> .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> <div
>>>>> >> class="im">&gt; As for this particular bug: thanks
>>>>> >> Walter!</div><div class="im"> &gt;<br> &gt; Philippe<br>
>>>>> >> <br>
>>>>> >> <br>
>>>>> >> </div>Actually, Johannes deserves your thanks for this one -- he
>>>>> >> wrote the<br> patch. :)<br><font class="Apple-style-span"
>>>>> >> color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I
>>>>> >> heartily thank Johannes. </div></div>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > You should stop using that html mumbo jumbo. Proper news readers
>>>>> > can't handle it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I use Outlook Express with HTML turned off, and it came out fine for
>>>>> me. I didn't see any of those tags. What reader are you using?
>>>
>>> I'm using Pan. This has worked just fine so far. Don't know what's
>>> causing this now.
>> 
>> When I first switched over to Linux, I used Pan, but IIRC, the ordering
>> was too difficult to deal with.  There were some other issues, but I
>> can't remember what they were now.
>> 
>> Opera is definitely the best one I've tried on Linux.
>> 
>> -Steve
> 
> Pan is more lightweight. Yes, I have a Core i7 with 24 GB of RAM, but am
> still using the same desktop applications I had 10 years ago. If the
> html garbage doesn't bother anyone else, I might as well shut up. Just
> mentioned - thought there might be a simple fix.

I also use Pan and I see that html garbage as well. Hopefully not too 
many will switch to that combined format.

BTW. Pan is the only option for me on netbook. 

Cheers
Piotrek