dmd2-2.052 is only for i386, while you are running amd64 (or dmd2 on FreeBSD)

[Iain Buclaw]

== Quote from Andrew Wiley (debio264 at gmail.com)'s article
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa <gour at atmarama.net> wrote:
> > yOn Sat, 9 Apr 2011 14:54:55 -0700
> > Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
> >
> >> So, yeah, it sucks that dmd is only a 32-bit binary, and there are
> >> currently no plans for it become a 64-bit binary,
> >
> > It's really strange to have 32bit executable on 64bit OS these days
> > and I?m running 64bit OS for years.
> I run 64 bit Windows 7, where around 70% of my applications are 32
> bit, and 64 bit Arch Linux, where multilib lets me install the 32 bit
> version of most applications. If you go through the Linux kernel
> archives, you'll find that running 32 bit applications on a 64 bit
> kernel is actually fairly popular because 64 bit applications need
> ~20% more memory due to increased pointer sizes.

Swollen pointers are a bit of a mute point to make as an argument for 32bit.