[OT] open-source license issues

["Jérôme M. Berger"]

Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> This, BTW, is why BSD is not acceptable for Phobos. 
> The requirement to put the license in the documentation (even if you
> distribute binary-only) is no good.

	Have you looked at the license agreement for most Microsoft
products? or most major video games? They all have some line saying
that "this product uses software developed by such and such", which
is no less than the BSD requires...

		Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeberger at free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeberger at jabber.fr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20110412/c3faa2ae/attachment.pgp>