too early for D2 and too late for D1

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sun Apr 17 13:44:16 PDT 2011


On 4/17/2011 1:46 PM, jasonw wrote:
> I'd like to hear your comments about the 32-bit D2 and minimal executables
> issue. If I use dietlibc and gcc, the minimal (static) binary is about 0.2
> kilobytes. DMD should have some switch (-embedded) which leaves out all the
> cruft I don't need. I'd like to use the cool new features and start with this
> kind of minimal executables. 0.5 - 50 kilobyte range is optimal.

Are you talking about static linking, or using shared libraries?



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list