std.parallelism: VOTE IN THIS THREAD

[Caligo]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
>> Lars T. Kyllingstad:
>> > Please vote in this thread, by replying with
>> >
>> >   - "YES" if you think std.parallelism should be included in Phobos
>> >
>> >     in its present form,
>> >
>> >   - "NO" if you think it shouldn't.
>>
>> If my vote counts then Yes.
>
> Everyone's vote on the newsgroup counts unless it becomes evident that we have
> a sock puppet problem or a ton of people that never post here start voting or
> some other problem occurs where it's evident that there's a problem which is
> skewing the votes. As long as things continue to go smoothly with the voting
> and people don't abuse it, anyone on the newsgroup can vote.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
>

I would like to make a comment if that's okay.  If a person is not an
expert on parallelism, library development, or we can't verify his or
her background and such, I don't see why their vote should count.  I'm
not voting because I'm just an ordinary D user, and I have no
expertise in parallelism.  And since this a public vote, if would be
great if people who are voting did not hide behind an alias, such as
bearophile.

P.S.
I can't wait for std.parallelism to become part of Phobos.