std.parallelism: VOTE IN THIS THREAD

[dsimcha]

On 4/24/2011 12:18 PM, lurker wrote:
> Yes, everyone is voting yes. And half of the voters haven't ever used parallelism or know anything about its library level design issues. This voting process seemed like a joke. I know this kind of voting is popular in other projects, but D community's infrastructure isn't ready for this. It just shows how UNagile and clumsy the design process is and merely a meat puppet theatre for hiding a dictatorship with uninformed "democracy". You could just add stuff until someone starts complaining and begin hardcore technical discussion when real problems arise.
>
> Cheers,
> sock puppet #2347

The review process leading up to the voting was not, however, a joke or 
unanimous or anything similar.  I received plenty of tough-but-fair 
criticism and it led to substantial improvements in the library and 
especially the documentation.