How about a Hash template?

[Alexander]

On 28.04.2011 21:46, Timon Gehr wrote:

> Why is 'in' not currently defined on arrays? To me it seems like a left-out that
> should be fixed, because it has quite obvious and useful semantics.

  +1. It would be very useful and convenient this way, especially if search will be optimized to series of comparisons for small item count.

  Perhaps we should file a feature request? :)

/Alexander