pi benchmark on ldc and dmd

simendsjo simendsjo at gmail.com
Tue Aug 2 13:58:13 PDT 2011


On 02.08.2011 22:36, Andrew Wiley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at ubuntu.com
> <mailto:ibuclaw at ubuntu.com>> wrote:
>
>     == Quote from KennyTM~ (kennytm at gmail.com
>     <mailto:kennytm at gmail.com>)'s article
>      > On Aug 2, 11 20:00, Jason House wrote:
>      > > The post says they did "dmd -O". They did not mention "-inline
>     -noboundscheck
>     -release". There may be extra flags that are required.
>      > >
>      > > Walter Bright Wrote:
>      > >
>      > >>
>     http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/j48tf/how_is_c_better_than_d/c29do98
>      > >>
>      > >> Anyone care to examine the assembler output and figure out why?
>      > >
>      > Let dmd have an '-O9999' flag to as a synonym of '-O -inline
>      > -noboundscheck -release' so people won't miss the extra flags in
>      > benchmarks. [/joke]
>
>
> -O9001 will make the Redditors happy.
>
>
>     -Ofast sounds better. ;)
>
>

How about replacing -w with -9001? 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9001#Contents_of_ISO_9001


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list