From a C++/JS benchmark

[Trass3r]

> I'd like to know why the GCC back-end is able to produce a more  
> efficient binary from the C++ code (compared to the D code), but now the  
> problem is not large, as before.

I attached both asm versions ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cppver.s
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 10123 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20110805/86bdd547/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dver.s
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 19604 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20110805/86bdd547/attachment-0003.obj>