std.concurrency wrapper over MPI?

[bearophile]

dsimcha:

> 1.  Is anyone besides me interested in this?

Other people are interested.


> 3.  Would this be Phobos material even though it would depend on MPI, or 
> would it better be kept as a 3rd party library?

I'd like one or more Phobos modules built on top of the basic MPI, so I think it's better to have MPI too in Phobos.


> Should the restriction be kept (for consistency) or 
> removed (because it doesn't serve much of a purpose in the MPI context)?

This not easy to say now, for me.

Bye,
bearophile