Why callers should explicitly document storage classes

[Vladimir Panteleev]

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:48:18 +0300, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:

> requiring lazy before lazy arguments basically destroys the reason for  
> lazy being in the language:
>
> int foo(lazy 2*3);
>
> is not better than
>
> int foo({return 2*3});

What about requiring "lazy" only for non-pure delegates?

-- 
Best regards,
  Vladimir                            mailto:vladimir at thecybershadow.net