Hidden module c'tors/d'tors?
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Mon Aug 15 14:41:48 PDT 2011
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:04:07 -0400, dsimcha <dsimcha at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm getting annoying runtime errors about "Cycle detected between
> modules with
> ctors/dtors" in a large program that doesn't have any module
> c'tors/d'tors, at
> least not explicitly. (i.e. there's no static this or static ~this in
> the
> whole project, not counting the libs it imports). Is there any way a
> module
> c'tor/d'tor could be hidden, such that there is one even if there's no
> actual
> static this statement?
From what I understand of how the compiler works, such ctor/dtors are put
into compiler-generated modules marked as "standalone", meaning they
should be ignored in terms of cycle detection (even though they *do* have
ctor/dtors).
Do you have an example? It may be a bug in the compiler/cycle detection
algorithm.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list