Unannotated abstract classes

[Mariusz Gliwiński]

Dnia środa, 17 sierpnia 2011 22:23:04 Jonathan M Davis pisze:
> I'm afraid that I don't quite get what you're trying to say.
Oh no, again :( I wonder if it's language bareer or just my freaky mind 
bareer.
> 
> Now, I would argue that it should probably be required that Child either
> override all of the abstract functions in its base classes so that it isn't
> abstract or that it be marked with abstract, but unfortunately, it looks
> like that's not required. It would probably be a fairly simple change to
> the language which wouldn't really break backwards compability. So, an
> enhancement request should probably be opened about that if it doesn't
> already exist.
I'm happy now. you understand me properly. My complaint is about fact, that 
Child isn't required to be marked with abstract.

Thanks,
Mariusz Gliwiński