Article about problems & suggestions for D 2.0

[Marco Leise]

Am 29.08.2011, 05:44 Uhr, schrieb kennytm <kennytm at gmail.com>:

> On the pattern matching syntax for templates in the comments -- Sigh, the
> spec gotta advertise this valid syntax in the operator overloading page
> more:
>
>     Foo opBinary(string op:"+")(...) { ... }

Is 'more' an euphemism? ;) Good to know this syntax is possible, thx for  
clarifying.