Article about problems & suggestions for D 2.0

[Sean Kelly]

That would be the easiest thing, yeah. I had some more complex ideas in the concurrency list, but dunno if they're practical. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 30, 2011, at 5:37 PM, dsimcha <dsimcha at yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 8/30/2011 8:01 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> I'd like to say that the 'shared' attribute on member functions should just mean "make this member visible through a shared reference"
> 
> So the idea would just be that shared is a programmer-verified seal of approval that "yes, this is thread-safe without the user of the object taking any additional precautions"?
>