Java > Scala

[Kagamin]

Walter Bright Wrote:

> On 11/30/2011 12:56 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> > Are you not being a bit simplistic here?
> >
> > There are several JVM implementations around not just one.
> 
> It's not the implementation that's the problem, it's the *definition* of the 
> bytecode for the JVM.

To think, LLVM devs complain about LLVM IR being so low-level, and it would so nice to have something as high-level as Java bytecode, which is so sweet for optimizers and jit.