The current status of D?
timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Sat Dec 3 14:47:57 PST 2011
On 12/03/2011 03:57 PM, Don wrote:
> On 01.12.2011 22:24, Buk wrote:
>> Simple question, though not necessarily a simple answer:
>> Is D ready for prime time?
>> 1. How stable is the language specification?
>> 2. How stable is the language implementation?
> I made a list of major language issues in mid-2009.
> The next release (2.057, release in December) implements half of the
> remaining items.
>> 3. How stable are the standard library specifications?
>> 4. How stable are the standard library implantations?
>> The last time I looked was just after the D1/D2 split, and much of the
>> was being revamped and the rate of changes and deprecations was (IMO)
>> too high
>> to consider its use for complex, multi-developer projects.
>> Looking around the docs here, I see that some of the libraries are due
>> deprecation early next year. Barring surprises, are they likely to be
>> the last
>> major changes?
>> Thanks for your time, buk.
- Clean up is(XXX) and __traits(XXX) syntax (eg via meta.XXX proposal,
There is nothing wrong with is(XXX), so what is this about?
More information about the Digitalmars-d