Second Round CURL Wrapper Review

[Vladimir Panteleev]

On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:33:52 +0200, Marco Leise <Marco.Leise at gmx.de> wrote:

> Am 04.12.2011, 14:02 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com>:
>
>> On 2011-12-03 05:26, dsimcha wrote:
>>> I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second round of
>>> Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was decided  
>>> that,
>>> after a large number of minor issues were fixed, a second round would  
>>> be
>>> necessary.
>>>
>>> Significant open issues:
>>>
>>> 1. Should libcurl be bundled with DMD on Windows?
>>>
>>> 2. etc.curl, std.curl, or std.net.curl? (We had a vote a while back but
>>> it was buried deep in a thread and a lot of people may have missed it:
>>> http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=4ebd3219011eb0e4518d35ab )
>>
>> I vote for std.net.curl.
>
> Hey you std.net.curl people must be cheating. You were 50% of the  
> etc.curl people in the past, now you are at 90% of them. Or did some  
> change of mind happen in the community recently?

That's internet polls for you. I think we should keep voting as NG  
replies, the same thing we do when voting on Phobos contributions.

-- 
Best regards,
  Vladimir                            mailto:vladimir at thecybershadow.net