The current status of D?

[Don]

On 05.12.2011 06:27, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/3/2011 6:53 PM, Don wrote:
>> It's the things like:
>> is (foo bar == super)
>> which I think you can't understand without looking up the spec every
>> time. We
>> still don't have a nice way of expressing such things.
>
> I agree, but that's a low priority for now, because at least you can get
> work done with it.

Right. But it's hard to come up with high-priority language issues these 
days. The old ones have been fixed. <g>.