Fixing const arrays

[Jakob Ovrum]

On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 15:14:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 12/12/11 9:07 AM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
>> If the programmer sees just "r.save", he
>> doesn't know whether it's a field or a property, and he 
>> shouldn't need
>> to know, it should be fast and cheap, and return a consistent 
>> value. As
>> far as I know, this isn't always true for save
>
> Why? Save does behave like a field for the vast majority of 
> structs.
>
> Andrei

But save is an abstract interface function, its signature should 
reflect all possible implementations.