Suggestion for std.process upgrade

Trass3r un at known.com
Mon Dec 12 15:04:47 PST 2011


> There is a completely revamped version of std.process.  It is being held  
> up right now because DMD on windows depends on DMC for it's C runtime,  
> and DMC has issues supporting pipes.

Walter should just release the few parts of the source code that according  
to Mehrdad are needed to get rid of it:

> Right, but my point is, I could work around (I've gotten within inches  
> of it!)
> it if simply Walter released a TINY part of snn.lib -- just a handful of  
> tiny source
> files regarding the TLS-related stuff, EXE segment markers, and whatnot.
> (I've already raised this issue before, and precisely what we would  
> need, but it seemed to go completely ignored.)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list