Fixing const arrays

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 02:28:29 torhu wrote:
> It's actually not 'save' being a noun that's the problem. I just
> thought of a counter-example:
> 
> ---
> struct Foo {
> // the data
> Bar data[];
> 
> // save data on shutdown?
> @property bool save() { return save_; }
> @property bool save(bool shouldShave) { return save_ = shouldSave; }
> 
> private:
> bool save_;
> }
> ---
> Not meant to be a realistic example, but save is fine as a property here.

You can pretty much always come up with another function with a completely 
different purpose wit the same name.

Personally, the _only_ issue that I have with save is the fact that it's a 
property. The name save works well enough, and I can't think of anything 
that's better.

- Jonathan M Davis