Fixing const arrays

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 12/13/11 10:32 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Monday, December 12, 2011 18:00:35 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 12/12/11 1:12 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> On Monday, December 12, 2011 08:46:18 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>> Insisting on the current property semantics was a sizeable mistake of
>>>> this community, and I am sorry we gave into it.
>>>
>>> Aside from the fact that the behavior of -property isn't the default,
>>> what's the problem with @property?
>>
>> Other than it being completely useless, requiring more rote
>> memorization, and fomenting time-wasting discussion? None.
>
> So, you prefer the situation where any function with no arguments can be used
> as a getter and any function with a single argument can be used as a setter?

No. That would be a false choice.

Andrei