Cilk Plus and more
bearophile
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Wed Dec 14 05:11:11 PST 2011
An computer science popularization article about Cilk and related matters, that I did miss, from the August:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-and-thread-parallelism/
It explains the not too much hard to undestand task parallelism with the spawn and sync keywords, the parallel for loops, that haven ot fully enforced constraints:
>The compiler will detect violations and enforce these restrictions in most cases. Exceptions are when the comparison value and index variable are updated through pointers.<
The Intel Cilk Plus Array Notation is similar to the vector syntax of D, you use:
a[:] = b[:] + c[:]
Instead of:
a[] = b[] + c[]
But the complete syntax supports a stride too:
array_base[begin:length:stride]
That allows code like this, similar to the Python NumPy one:
a[0:5][3][0:8:2]
Intrinsic functions like _sec_reduce_add remind me the desire for a sum() in Phobos:
int[] a;
int total = sum(a); // no exception here
assert(total == 0);
The Intel Cilk Plus Elemental Function annotated with __declspec(vector) seem similar to D2 pure functions, but the compieler seems to use them better (so it's not a matter of language, but implementation).
I have a D version too of the Ambient Occlusion Benchmark (AOBench), of course.
In the end a 16.5x with a 4-core CPU is nice.
Bye,
bearophile
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list