Tango for D2 (Was: D1 to be discontinued on December 31, 2012)

[Dejan Lekic]

Before I say anything, I want to say that I always used Phobos 
because I do not want to sound to some people like Tango 
advocate. I humbly believe Tango is still superior in many places 
comparing to Phobos. Take a look at Tango conduits for an 
example, and you will understand what I mean. Tango has been made 
to be a framework ready for enterprise use, and I seriously 
believe Tango, if ported to work on top of druntime and phobos 
will still attract users.

I live in Java world nowadays, where Java IO and NIO 1 and 2 are 
standards. Tango is very close to NIO, and I believe it has been 
modeled after Java NIO. Kudos to designers and developers. I 
always wished it had been refactored to work on top of Phobos, 
which I still count as a low-level library.

In my perfect D world, druntime would be the lowest level 
library, phobos little bit higher, but still low level, and the 
third layer would be Tango, with all high-level features it 
possesses.

Kind regards