On Thursday, December 15, 2011 09:32:37 deadalnix wrote: > The same goes for private virtual methods actually. They cannot be > called, but they can be reimplemented in subclasses. > > If you put that detail asside, this is a neat idea. I'd love to see that > in D. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4542