SDC & ddmd

Don nospam at nospam.com
Thu Dec 15 08:47:50 PST 2011


On 10.12.2011 12:17, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 10:54 AM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
>> On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 09:47:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2011 10:40 AM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
>>>> We intend to be compatible with DMD to a point. Where we are not, will
>>>> be through omission. Off the top of my head:
>>>> [...]
>>>> *D's forward reference and module order bugs will not be supported.
>>>>
>>>> [snip.]
>>>>
>>>
>>> How is that an 'omission'?
>>
>> Just my lame attempt at humour. :P
>
> Should have thought of that. =)
> Do you already have a working design? I think what Don suggested
> (process static if and mixins in sequence, everything else on by need
> basis) does not work in the general case because you can have static if
> and mixin declaration dependencies across module import cycles.

Do you have an example? Would be good to discuss.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list