64-bit DMD for windows?

Nick Sabalausky a at a.a
Fri Dec 16 09:59:43 PST 2011


"Nick Sabalausky" <a at a.a> wrote in message 
news:jcg0q8$145v$1 at digitalmars.com...
> "Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote in message 
> news:mailman.1595.1324029407.24802.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
>>
>> And considering that there are no x86 chips sold these days which aren't
>> x86_64, I find it rather baffling that Microsoft even sells a 32-bit 
>> version of
>> Windows.
>
> (Chips sold) != (Chips in use)
>
> Why would MS want to give a big F.U. to someone who wants to give MS money 
> but isn't buying new hardware? Wouldn't make any sense.
>

Also, the 64-bit versions can't run 16-bit software, and yes, I know that's 
getting *really*, *really* old, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are 
people out there (companies, especially) that are still relying on something 
16-bit. (In case anyone's wondering, and I'm sure some people are ;) : No, 
I'm not personally using Windows's 16-bit compatability for anything.)




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list