SDC & ddmd
dolive
dolive89 at sina.com
Sat Dec 17 02:54:26 PST 2011
Bernard Helyer Wrote:
> We intend to be compatible with DMD to a point. Where we are not,
> will be through omission. Off the top of my head:
>
> *delete will not be implemented.
> *scope classes will not be implemented.
> *complex numbers will not be implemented.
> *version/debug levels will not be implemented, as their semantics
> are poorly documented, and I've never seen them used in any code
> anywhere.
> *C style function pointers will not be supported.
> *The D calling convention will not be matched, at least not in 1.0
> (extern (D) is currently fastcall)
> *D's forward reference and module order bugs will not be
> supported.
>
> And others I've probably forgotten. In terms of release date, I
> can't really say, sorry. Currently working on the D interpreter
> for CTFE and constant expressions, if you're interested. :D
>
>
> -Bernard.
>
So many features are not implemented can be
compatible with dmd2 ? In addition , the current sdc in what state?
Feature list is up to date? what time is expected time to be completed for 0.1?
Good luck!
dolive
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list