Next in Review Queue (12/18/2011)? std.serialize/orange?

[Alex Rønne Petersen]

On 18-12-2011 21:24, dsimcha wrote:
> The review of std.net.curl is done and the voting has started. I'm
> loving this steady pipeline of reviews and additions to Phobos.
> According to http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue, there's
> nothing ready for review now, though.
>
> Jacob Carlborg, are you ready to have std.serialize reviewed for
> inclusion in Phobos in a week? Serialization is a pretty high priority
> and should be reviewed ASAP if it's ready. Otherwise, does anyone else
> have something to fill in the bubble in the queue? I'd like to start a
> new review after the std.net.curl vote is done.

I hate to be the one doing this, but can I nitpick on the name? 
std.serialization sounds much better than std.serialize for a module name.

In any case, +1 for having Orange up for review next! Would definitely 
like to see it in Phobos ASAP.

- Alex