d future or plans for d3

[Timon Gehr]

On 12/19/2011 12:24 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Sunday, 18 December 2011 at 23:18:22 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> You are right. I have had in mind a generational GC that uses a
>> copying collector for the nursery as this is what most
>> state-of-the-art VM GCs do.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> We can change the way unions are layed out. The compiler can mark GC
>> memory passed to a C function as non-movable, or passing GC memory to
>> a C function can be made illegal if the GC is enabled.
>
> These changes are too invasive for the language at this point, I
> believe. We need to work with what we have.

I disagree. Code that relies on other semantics would just have to use 
conservative GC.