DI Generation Needs your Help!

[Jakob Ovrum]

On Monday, 19 December 2011 at 08:11:26 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
> Let me know what you think!

Nice work! I think this is going to be more and more relevant now 
that the situation with shared libraries is getting more 
interesting in D.

I would argue that anything that can't be moved to a different 
library, like templates, manifest constants etc. must be kept in 
as-is. D interface generation isn't just useful for hiding source 
code; some people just want to put as much as possible in a 
shared library, speed up compilation or hide as much as possible 
with the restriction of keeping the code working as usual.

If people want to hide their source code at all cost, they can 
make this do a pass to easily identify what needs to be moved to 
a different module, then do the rest manually (which of course, 
only needs to be done once).