DI Generation Needs your Help!
so
so at so.so
Mon Dec 19 04:11:31 PST 2011
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:11:25 +0200, Adam Wilson <flyboynw at gmail.com> wrote:
> Everything else is left alone. Templates and mixins are not addressed
> with this code and *should* not be modified. That's where I need your
> help, the test cases I have written cover some basic scenarios but I
> don't have the capability to test these changes with the diverse code
> base that the community has created.
I am not exactly sure about your problem with templates and mixins but
i'll give it a try regardless :)
Since with templates there is no distinction between definition and
decleration,
exposing them IMO should be solely based on thier module access signatures.
private struct A() // hide
public struct B() // expose
Now if B or some another exposed structure in ".di" should call A,
compiler will take care of it by outputting an error as usual.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list