DI Generation Needs your Help!

[so]

On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:04:27 +0200, so <so at so.so> wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:24:18 +0200, Adam Wilson <flyboynw at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> So the consensus is to keep all private members/imports/etc?
>
> Ideally to get most out of the auto generation of di files (by  
> definition of module system) we need to strip ALL private stuff.
> Only this way we can say the automation is on par with handcrafting.
> But if it does not look doable somehow, we can always handcraft them  
> (which i'll generally prefer),

ALL "except" imports :)