Next in Review Queue (12/18/2011)? std.serialize/orange?

[Alix Pexton]

On 18/12/2011 21:17, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 18-12-2011 21:24, dsimcha wrote:
>> The review of std.net.curl is done and the voting has started. I'm
>> loving this steady pipeline of reviews and additions to Phobos.
>> According to http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue, there's
>> nothing ready for review now, though.
>>
>> Jacob Carlborg, are you ready to have std.serialize reviewed for
>> inclusion in Phobos in a week? Serialization is a pretty high priority
>> and should be reviewed ASAP if it's ready. Otherwise, does anyone else
>> have something to fill in the bubble in the queue? I'd like to start a
>> new review after the std.net.curl vote is done.
>
> I hate to be the one doing this, but can I nitpick on the name?
> std.serialization sounds much better than std.serialize for a module name.
>
> In any case, +1 for having Orange up for review next! Would definitely
> like to see it in Phobos ASAP.
>
> - Alex

I recently started abbreviating Serialization as s11n (Es-Eleven-En) in 
the same vain as i18n for Internationalization and l10n for 
Localization. Its not my invention, its in use in C/C++ libs and 
probably other languages too. I think std.s11n; world be an acceptable 
module name.

A...