d future or plans for d3

Timon Gehr timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Tue Dec 20 12:11:27 PST 2011


On 12/20/2011 08:33 PM, Robert Jacques wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:54:22 -0800, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:
>
>> On 12/19/2011 07:50 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>> On Monday, 19 December 2011 at 08:28:52 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
>>>> According to this wikipedia page
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boehm_garbage_collector it is also the GC
>>>> that is used by D, with some minor modifications of course.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if that's true... I believe that they both use the same
>>> basic idea, but AFAIK the D garbage collector is a D port of a C rewrite
>>> which was originally written for something else. The D GC has been
>>> optimized a lot since its first versions.
>>
>> It would probably be interesting to test the mostly concurrent
>> generational Boehm GC with D. I'd expect it to perform a lot better than
>> the simple mark and sweep GC we have in druntime.
>>
>
> The Boehm GC isn't concurrent nor generational.

http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/

'The collector uses a mark-sweep algorithm. It provides incremental and 
generational collection under operating systems which provide the right 
kind of virtual memory support. [...]'

http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/gcdescr.html

'Generational Collection and Dirty Bits
We basically use the concurrent and generational GC algorithm described 
in "Mostly Parallel Garbage Collection", by Boehm, Demers, and Shenker.'



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list