Carmack about static analysis

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Saturday, 24 December 2011 at 23:12:27 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> I was talking about the abundance of (({}){()}) and not about 
> identifiers length.

It's the same fallacy. I can't read Carmack's mind, but
I'm sure he's talking about shortening code the same way
I would mean it if I said it - simpler concepts, fewer cases,
less repetition.

It's about how much you have to think about, now how much you
have to read/write.