CURL Wrapper: Congratulations Next up: std.serialize

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 23:07:51 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> I think it is, don't know what others think. What it does is it catches
> AssertErrors so other unit tests can continue to run and then gives a
> nice report at the end.

I'm against it. I think that the compiler/runtime should be fixed so that each 
unit test block is run in a module even if one fails. That would solve the 
problem quite nicely IMHO, and that's already _supposed_ to be how it works. 
It just isn't properly implemented in that regard yet. And I'm against 
unittest blocks running any code after a single failure. So, I don't think 
that any additional unit testing framework is necessary.

- Jonathan M Davis