A nice way to step into 2012

[Don]

On 29.12.2011 09:34, Derek wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:07:17 +1100, Don <nospam at nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
>> sin(real x);
>> sin(real theta);
>>
>> The argument name is *completely* irrelevant. That shouldn't be part
>> of the interface.
>>
>> I have a really really bad taste in my mouth from named arguments in COM.
>
> Were you forced to use named parameters or was it optional?

Forced to support them. The great evil is that the named arguments can 
arrive in any order.

You're not forced to use them. It's just for the benefit of VB.