std.xml should just go

[Tomek Sowiński]

Jonathan M Davis napisał:

> I think that at least a couple of people have said that they have the beginnings 
> of a replacement, but I don't believe that anyone has stepped up to say that 
> they'll actually complete and propose a module for inclusion in Phobos.

Wimps ;-)

> So, std.xml is still very much up in the air, and Tango has set a very high bar 
> with regards to speed. And while we may not be able to match Tango for speed - 
> especially at first - we'd definitely like to have an xml solution that's close. 
> And that's not necessarily going to be easy - especially since we're inevitably 
> going to want a range-based solution. And while ranges can be quite efficient, it 
> can also be easy to make them inefficient if you're not careful.

Speaking of Tango, may I look at it? I remember that beef over the first datetime and it gives me shivers...

-- 
Tomek