std.unittests/exception Update and Vote [Please Vote]

[Andrew Wiley]

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>wrote:

> There are a number of people who have responded positively to my unit test
> functions - including assertPred - as it has moved through the review
> process.
> Please reiterate that positive vote here (or negative if you're so
> inclined).
> The deadline for votes is today.
>
> As it stands, I believe that assertThrown, assertNotThrown, and
> collectExceptionMsg will clearly pass the vote, but it's not so clear if
> the
> vote is in favor of assertPred. Going off just the votes in this thread, I
> believe that it would be a tie as to whether assertPred made it in or not.
> But
> if we took the votes for the group of functions as a whole from previous
> posts,
> I believe that it would get in. It would be better though if such votes
> were
> confirmed here - especially if the vote is close. I'd prefer not to have an
> ambiguous vote.
>
> So, please vote.
>
>
I realize I'm not much of an active community member, but I would vote yes
to all. I agree with you that assertPred does more than assert by itself
could ever reasonably do, and I don't find it difficult to understand (at
least, no more difficult than the "a < b" binaryFun syntax).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20110207/08b09752/attachment-0001.html>