Hot for dmd 64bit

Bruno Medeiros brunodomedeiros+spam at com.gmail
Thu Feb 10 07:45:53 PST 2011


On 27/01/2011 18:56, Eric Poggel wrote:
> On 1/27/2011 1:32 AM, dwilson wrote:
>> Beside praying and pestering, what can we D non-experts do to help get
>> a stable 64-bit dmd available?
>>
>> Killer D features are strings, slick built in dynamics arrays, no
>> headers files to keep in sync, and the
>> other nice features often praised by others. I'm not sure yet that D
>> is my favorite language, but it's in
>> the list of top three.
>>
>> Killing D (at least for me) is the limit choices for compiling on
>> 64-bit Linux with D2 and preferably Phobos
>> instead of Tango. My setup, for reasons I haven't investigated deeply,
>> can't run 32-bit anything, and I do
>> intend to work on huge arrays of data, a few GB in RAM. As for Phobos,
>> it's obviously more Mars-related
>> than "Tango" :)
>>
>>
>
> When 64-bit dmd arrives for Windows, what will be used for a linker?
> Will optlink be ported also?

I'm curious about this as well. Will it require a new linker? :/

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list