Stupid little iota of an idea

[spir]

On 02/12/2011 12:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 2/12/11 5:02 AM, bearophile wrote:
>> Jonathan M Davis:
>>
>>> interval is slightly better, but as you mention, the step value muddles that
>>> abstraction.
>>
>> It's not muddled enough to make it worse than iota(). "iota" has nearly no
>> relation with its purpose in Phobos.
>
> And that's part of what makes it best.

What about a random name generator to define a language.stdlib's lexicon? Then 
run a post-filter fed by user complaints about given names actually suggesting 
some relation to any [part|aspect] of their sense.

denis
-- 
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com