tooling quality and some random rant

[Denis Koroskin]

On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:01:53 +0300, Walter Bright  
<newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Michel Fortin wrote:
>> But note I was replying to your reply to Denis who asked specifically  
>> for demangled names for missing symbols. This by itself would be a  
>> useful improvement.
>
> I agree with that, but there's a caveat. I did such a thing years ago  
> for C++ and Optlink. Nobody cared, including the people who asked for  
> that feature. It's a bit demotivating to bother doing that again.

Many people are unthankful by nature. They tell about missing features  
while taking existing ones as granted.
It doesn't mean no one cares about them. If no one would care, why would  
we even discuss those features?