Removed? (Wikipedia deletionism)

[Kagamin]

Vladimir Panteleev Wrote:

> Wikipedia articles must prove that they are notable enough, and people  
> unfamiliar with the subject must be able to verify it. Otherwise, it  
> fosters self-promotion.
> 
> Wikipedia has rules which may seem unfair or unbalanced at times, but  
> they're mostly logical with regards to the project's integrity (and not  
> necessarily usefulness).

The wikipedia rules explicitly state that they should be taken with common sense and deletion of nemerle is obviously beyond it. Not even speaking that they were given a scholarly article.

ps I'm not a nemerle fan and hate functional languages.