the naked keyword is an attribute - but it looks like an function when used?

[Denis Koroskin]

On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:45:21 +0300, dennis luehring <dl.soluz at gmx.net>  
wrote:

> naked INSIDE of the context which is adress with the attribute - looks  
> very strange to me, because it changes the pro- AND epilog of an  
> function/codeblock
>
> real blabla(real x)
> {
>    asm{
>      naked;
>      mov EAX,[RSP];
>      naked;
>      add EAX,0x3fff;
>      naked;
>    }
> }
>
> wouldn't it be better to have something like
>
> naked asm{
> ...
> }
>
> or
>
> real blabla(real x) naked
> {
>    naked asm{
>    }
> }
>
> or like delphi does
>
> real blabla( x: real ) assembler
> {
>    mov EAX,[RSP];
>    add EAX,0x3fff;
> }

Yes, naked applied to the whole function body, and I proposed to make it  
an external attribute because of that:

http://www.mail-archive.com/digitalmars-d@puremagic.com/msg22593.html