Moving to D

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:46:47 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:

> Russel Winder wrote:
>> Pity, because using one of Mercurial, Bazaar or Git instead of
>> Subversion is likely the best and fastest way of getting more quality
>> contributions to review.  Although only anecdotal in every case where a
>> team has switched to DVCS from CVCS -- except in the case of closed
>> projects, obviously -- it has opened things up to far more people to
>> provide contributions.  Subversion is probably now the single biggest
>> barrier to getting input on system evolution.
> 
> 
> A couple months back, I did propose moving to git on the dmd internals
> mailing list, and nobody was interested.

I proposed the same on the Phobos list in May, but the discussion went 
nowhere.  It seemed the general consensus was that SVN was "good enough".

-Lars