const/immutable member functions

bearophile bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Tue Jan 25 01:59:50 PST 2011


Jens Mueller:

> all mean the same. And Walter seems to be unsure whether forbidding
> const void foo() is worth the trouble, isn't it?
> I see and felt the pain for newcomers to decipher the meaning of
> const void foo();
> I see two options:

Now I'd like to know what Andrei thinks about this.

Bye,
bearophile


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list