std.unittests [updated] for review

[spir]

On 01/30/2011 01:13 PM, Jens Mueller wrote:
> I do not like putting it in std.exception. Maybe the name std.unittest
> is also not good. I would propose std.assert if assert wasn't a keyword.
> [...]
  I would_not_  expect helpers for writing
> assertions (Assert_Error_) in a module named std.exception.

Same for me. Find it strange. Would never search assertion helper funcs inside 
std.exception. Why not std.assertion? std.unittests would be fine if there were 
some more stuff in there, I mean not only assertions. Else, the obvious name 
imo is std.assertion.

Denis
-- 
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com