Shortcut evaluation for hierarchy of in contracts
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sat Jul 2 18:02:05 PDT 2011
On 7/2/2011 4:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 7/1/11 6:32 PM, Robert Jacques wrote:
>> No. I think the current behavior is correct. In fact, if anything, D
>> shouldn't allow you to define an in contract on any override method. A
>> Sub is a Base and therefore must be able to handle all inputs that are
>> valid for a Base.
>
> That is a sensible enhancement.
This would throw out the whole idea of 'loosening'.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list